2 errors away from HTML validation

[Gomeza]

Hello boys and girls

 

I always do a thorough search of this forum before posting a question and haven't as yet found anything.

 

I am looking for the files in my osCommerce that produce the following HTML output. (this is how the code is returned during the validation process) I need to remove the portions that are underlined to validate.

 

"…uttons/button_quick_find.gif" border="0" alt="Quick Find" title=" Quick Find"

 

" <tr width="100%" class="SideinfoBoxHeading">"

 

Both code snippets are unnecessary.

 

Thanx in advance for anyone who replies

[failsafe]

I am looking for the files in my osCommerce that produce the following HTML output. (this is how the code is returned during the validation process) I need to remove the portions that are underlined to validate.

 

"…uttons/button_quick_find.gif" border="0" alt="Quick Find" title=" Quick Find"

 

" <tr width="100%" class="SideinfoBoxHeading">"

 

Both code snippets are unnecessary.

 

Yes, there are quite some HTML errors in the stock osC code regarding 'correctness' for validation. The second you mention is caused by:

 

includes/functions/html_output.php (about line 121), inside function tep_image_submit, should be:

	$image_submit = '<input type="image" src="' . tep_output_string(DIR_WS_LANGUAGES . $language . '/images/buttons/' . $image) . '" alt="' . tep_output_string($alt) . '"';

(the border="0" is not allowed there)

 

Unfortunately, " <tr width="100%" class="SideinfoBoxHeading">" is not part of the stock osC code (osC2.2RC2a). Can't find it, sorry. It must be part of a contribution you've added. Suggest you search all your php files on "SideinfoBoxHeading" to find it, or search on "tr width", that should catch it.

 

Did you fix the & in URLs validation error? That's a very common complaint from the validator. See same file (includes/functions/html_output.php) in function tep_href_link() on the line that reads " $separator = '&';". It should be " $separator = '&';"

[Gomeza]

Thanx failsafe

 

I now have just one error and you have set me on the right track looking in the modifications I have added instead of the stock osC files. I think I'm going to crack a bottle of champagne when I find it, validating the CSS was fairly easy but the HTML has been difficult to say the least.

 

Your input is much appreciated - thanx again.