Guest Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 I need to know from an authorative source what search engine friendly URL contribution I should use. I know I'm up for a challenge. I'm on an IIS host and when I implement Use Search-Engine Safe URLs (still in development) in osC all my link break. Please shoot a quick reply with any information that can help. Oh....btw forget Chemo's stuff. I can't deal with a banned user's contrib. Regards, Eric K. Cone
Guest Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 I need to know from an authorative source what search engine friendly URL contribution I should use. I know I'm up for a challenge. I'm on an IIS host and when I implement Use Search-Engine Safe URLs (still in development) in osC all my link break. Please shoot a quick reply with any information that can help. Oh....btw forget Chemo's stuff. I can't deal with a banned user's contrib. Regards, Eric K. Cone h4te to bump, but i need help
UncleSteve Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 h4te to bump, but i need help I'm not authorative, however... as you've discovered it dosn't work on it's own. You need to search through the contribs and look for "Ultimate SEO URLs" apparently v2.1d is the most stable .... But I'm still working on it, but my store is heavily modified. ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________
♥toyicebear Posted October 29, 2006 Posted October 29, 2006 I need to know from an authorative source what search engine friendly URL contribution I should use. I know I'm up for a challenge. I'm on an IIS host and when I implement Use Search-Engine Safe URLs (still in development) in osC all my link break. Please shoot a quick reply with any information that can help. Oh....btw forget Chemo's stuff. I can't deal with a banned user's contrib. Regards, Eric K. Cone Chemos contrib are the only ones which work for IIS , since the p-name and c- name contribution does not use mod rewrite. (Its also an admin choosable option for Ultimate Seo Urls up to version Ultimate SEO URLs v2.0b i seem to remeber) On the other hand you do not really need to use any Search Engine Friendly contribution, sinc the standard urls inexes very well in all the major search engines today. Since you are on a IIS , you should instead foccus on getting individual page titelse/meta tags and google xml sitemap + all products. Basics for osC 2.2 Design - Basics for Design V2.3+ - Seo & Sef Url's - Meta Tags for Your osC Shop - Steps to prevent Fraud... - MS3 and Team News... - SEO, Meta Tags, SEF Urls and osCommerce - Commercial Support Inquiries - OSC 2.3+ How To To see what more i can do for you check out my profile [click here]
Guest Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 Chemos contrib are the only ones which work for IIS , since the p-name and c- name contribution does not use mod rewrite. (Its also an admin choosable option for Ultimate Seo Urls up to version Ultimate SEO URLs v2.0b i seem to remeber) On the other hand you do not really need to use any Search Engine Friendly contribution, sinc the standard urls inexes very well in all the major search engines today. Since you are on a IIS , you should instead foccus on getting individual page titelse/meta tags and google xml sitemap + all products. I've got Header Tags (HTC) installed, and I love the ability to manualy set everything, and I'm using phpSitemapNG to generate the XML sitemap. Heres what is confusing me. I'm signed up with everything from google. Analytics, webmaster tools (submit sitemap), and they still hold in their cache my site as it existed on 10-20 when I was developing in DotNetNuke. DNN was a nightmare. I guess the Googlebot will come eventuallty and update but man.... I wish it were faster
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.