vootie Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 The images I'm displaying are good quality screen shots of web site, about 600wideby300 high. I have the admin settings for height set to 100 and the width calculated automatically. However, the resulting thumbnail is really jaggy, basically unusable. Is there a setting I have missed somewhere that controls image quality? Failing this, is there a way to add the thumbnails myself if I create them locally? Although since there are hundreds, I hope that's not necessary. Best wishes
Flyer5 Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 The images I'm displaying are good quality screen shots of web site, about 600wideby300 high. I have the admin settings for height set to 100 and the width calculated automatically. However, the resulting thumbnail is really jaggy, basically unusable. Is there a setting I have missed somewhere that controls image quality? Failing this, is there a way to add the thumbnails myself if I create them locally? Although since there are hundreds, I hope that's not necessary. Best wishes have you tried the on the fly thumbnailer? does a sterling job and saves you loads of work. check the contributions section. f5
GraphicsGuy Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 Any of the autothumbnail contributions would help with that: 'On the Fly' Auto Thumbnailer using GD Library Image Magic - On-the-fly thumbnails, watermarks and image processing JPG Thumbnailer Thumbnailer with Caching Rule #1: Without exception, backup your database and files before making any changes to your files or database. Rule #2: Make sure there are no exceptions to Rule #1.
Flyer5 Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 Any of the autothumbnail contributions would help with that: 'On the Fly' Auto Thumbnailer using GD Library Image Magic - On-the-fly thumbnails, watermarks and image processing JPG Thumbnailer Thumbnailer with Caching haha, you have more energy than me - but i have had a long day....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.