Jump to content
  • Checkout
  • Login
  • Get in touch

osCommerce

The e-commerce.

Sitemap or All Products?


Guest

Recommended Posts

Posted

A sitemap is for humans and an all products page is for spiders.

 

A sitemap provides a hierachial view of the website structure and helps navigation. However, for search engine purposes it only points them in the right direction of the categories!

 

Think about this: when you search for a keyphrase how many times does a "contact us" or "shipping info" result come up? Never...because it is usually not relevant to the searcher. It is only relevant to a customer once they land on your site.

 

If you had to choose one area of your store to have listed on search results which area would it be? Articles? Information pages? Categories? PRODUCTS?

 

Let's face it -> the meat and bones of your store are the product pages. This should be the primary focus of all efforts since that is where you close the deal and "window shoppers" become paying customers. The product pages should have good content and distinct document structure. In order to get the customers to the now immaculate product page you will need to provide a healthy buffet of spider food...otherwise known as the all products contribution.

 

As the sitemap is to customers as the all products page is to spiders. It provides a hierachial map of the store's main content (product pages!). Don't make the spiders search 2 or 3 levels deep to find your products! This turns the tables and instead of spidering from the top down they will spider from the bottom up.

 

So, which is better? They both serve different purposes and should not be viewed as competing pages. The sitemap provides a visual navigation aide to customers and the all products page provides a hierachial map of your products to spiders.

 

Here are my favorite contributions that I use on client sites:

 

Sitemap MS2-2.2

All Products Page

 

I would recommend installing both. There are different flavors of each contribution and your mileage may vary :)

 

Enjoy!

 

Bobby

Posted

Wouldn't a site map with a logical and heirarchical listing of every page in the site, including all categories and products, serve both functions? I hardcoded a site map for my site, with links to each page. Spiders can see all of the products, and forums, and follow the links to them, and customers can find all of the related info pages they might want to access, in case they were to dense to follow any of the redundant links on the catalog pages!

 

Jeremy

Posted

If you remove the category box (tree) on the left that would be the best contribution for spiders that I've seen...of course with SEO URLs it would be just a little bit better :)

 

Very nice!

 

Bobby

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Wouldn't a site map with a logical and heirarchical listing of every page in the site, including all categories and products, serve both functions?  I hardcoded a site map for my site, with links to each page.  Spiders can see all of the products, and forums, and follow the links to them, and customers can find all of the related info pages they might want to access, in case they were to dense to follow any of the redundant links on the catalog pages!

 

Jeremy

 

The "All Products" contribution also lists all of the content (ie. the product descriptions) along with the products which the search engines like.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have installed the "all products" contribution but my store has over 7000 products and the page produced is obviously pretty big with thousands of links. I read somewhere that search engines do not spider pages over a certain size or follow more than 100 links per page. Is this correct? If so wouldn't it be better if allprods split the page like product_listing does?

 

Steve

Posted

Ive also added the printable catalog contribution, as i been told for one you customers will like it, and this is a little extra for them little hungry spiders.

 

but even if the spiders do not like it i cant see the harm in having one.

 

Kind regards

Posted
I have installed the "all products" contribution but my store has over 7000 products and the page produced is obviously pretty big with thousands of links.  I read somewhere that search engines do not spider pages over a certain size or follow more than 100 links per page.  Is this correct?  If so wouldn't it be better if allprods split the page like product_listing does?

 

Steve

 

I'm interested in an answer to this as well. Any ideas?

HIM - Dark Light - Out on 26/09/05
Posted

I have installed Allprods as well as Header Tags and I am optimistic that you folks out there are smarter than I am about SEO issues. But can someone explain to me how Allprods works? When I look at the code that is created it does not create static pages, so how does a bot know what is out there? :huh:

 

I uderstand the Header Tags contribution but Allprods baffels me :'(

 

Thanks

Rick

Posted
I have installed Allprods as well as Header Tags and I am optimistic that you folks out there are smarter than I am about SEO issues.  But can someone explain to me how Allprods works? When I look at the code that is created it does not create static pages, so how does a bot know what is out there? :huh:

 

I uderstand the Header Tags contribution but Allprods baffels me :'(

 

Thanks

Rick

 

Allprods create a page with links to all your products so that the itsy bitsy search engine spiders can find and index absolutely all of your products :D

Posted

Can anyone help with some code for splitting the allprods contribution listing to 50 per page?

 

Thanks

 

Steve

 

Yea just split it up.  i would put the listing to around 50-75 per page.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I have to say that I have both a sitemap for the site, and one for the shop, and then an all products page, and I get a huge amount of traffic from the all_products page alone. Google especially has picked up the items in all_products.php lately, and we get huge amounts of google traffic from that.

 

I'm totally going to be so excited once google picks up the sitemap.xml from Chemo's contribution, so I'm really hoping I'll have to switch servers for bandwidth issues. :ph34r:

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...